IBND vs. JEMA
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA).
IBND and JEMA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBND is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. It was launched on May 19, 2010. JEMA is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Mar 10, 2021.
Performance
IBND vs. JEMA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBND vs. JEMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | -2.80% | 16.17% | -2.81% | 10.38% | -19.44% | -5.12% |
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 6.18% | 34.89% | 5.68% | 9.82% | -24.98% | -4.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBND achieves a -2.80% return, which is significantly lower than JEMA's 6.18% return.
IBND
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -2.80%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- -1.27%
- 10Y*
- 0.50%
JEMA
- 1D
- 3.81%
- 1M
- -8.75%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 40.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBND vs. JEMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JEMA's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IBND vs. JEMA — Risk / Return Rank
IBND
JEMA
IBND vs. JEMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBND | JEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.90 | -0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 2.50 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.38 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 3.01 | -1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.91 | 12.02 | -8.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBND | JEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.90 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.20 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.19 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between IBND and JEMA is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IBND vs. JEMA - Dividend Comparison
IBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than JEMA's 2.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | 2.65% | 2.49% | 2.61% | 2.08% | 0.54% | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.76% | 2.93% | 2.44% | 2.95% | 2.69% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IBND vs. JEMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBND drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum JEMA drawdown of -39.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBND and JEMA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBND | JEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.62% | -39.50% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.75% | -13.11% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.32% | -39.50% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.03% | -9.80% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -17.56% | +6.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 3.28% | -1.25% |
Volatility
IBND vs. JEMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) is 4.05%, while JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) has a volatility of 11.08%. This indicates that IBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBND | JEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 11.08% | -7.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.56% | 15.52% | -9.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.92% | 21.20% | -12.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.70% | 18.54% | -8.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 18.55% | -9.61% |