PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBND vs. HYXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBND vs. HYXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBND achieves a -2.31% return, which is significantly lower than HYXF's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IBND has underperformed HYXF with an annualized return of 0.70%, while HYXF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.07% annualized return.


IBND

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
-2.31%
6M
-2.34%
1Y
0.30%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
-1.40%
10Y*
0.70%

HYXF

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.41%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBND vs. HYXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF
-2.31%16.17%-2.81%10.38%-19.44%-8.40%11.50%4.41%-6.15%14.84%
HYXF
iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.17%8.88%8.35%11.87%-11.90%2.60%6.07%14.87%-0.24%6.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IBND and HYXF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016

0.34

The correlation between IBND and HYXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBND vs. HYXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBND
IBND Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBND Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBND Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

HYXF
HYXF Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HYXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HYXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBND vs. HYXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBNDHYXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.26

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

2.06

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.11

9.22

-9.11

IBND vs. HYXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the HYXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBND and HYXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBND vs. HYXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBND drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, which is greater than HYXF's maximum drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBND and HYXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBNDHYXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.62%

-18.75%

-16.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

-2.57%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.18%

-4.81%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.49%

-16.00%

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.62%

-18.75%

-16.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.57%

-0.25%

-10.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.63%

-2.57%

-8.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

0.57%

+2.07%

Volatility

IBND vs. HYXF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF) at 1.14%. This indicates that IBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBNDHYXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

1.14%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.32%

3.03%

+3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.03%

3.84%

+4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.75%

8.05%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.92%

8.31%

+0.61%

IBND vs. HYXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HYXF's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBND vs. HYXF - Dividend Comparison

IBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than HYXF's 6.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYXF
iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.08%6.19%6.40%5.93%5.37%4.56%4.96%5.29%6.14%5.85%3.16%0.00%
IBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF
2.77%2.49%2.61%2.08%0.54%0.38%0.45%0.67%0.71%0.34%0.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBND and HYXF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBND has higher volatility (2.06%) compared to HYXF (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBND dropped -35.62% vs HYXF's -18.75%.

On 10-year performance, HYXF leads with 5.07% vs 0.70% for IBND. On fees, HYXF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYXF has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYXF has performed better with a 5.07% return vs 0.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYXF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBND.

HYXF has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 2.77% for IBND.

IBND is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HYXF is High Yield Bonds. IBND tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond, while HYXF tracks Bloomberg MSCI US High Yield Corporate Choice ESG Screened. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBND and 0.35% for HYXF.

HYXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBND and HYXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer