IBND vs. BSCQ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ).

IBND and BSCQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBND is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. It was launched on May 19, 2010. BSCQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. It was launched on Sep 14, 2016. Both IBND and BSCQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IBND vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IBND vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF	-2.80%	16.17%	-2.81%	10.38%	-19.44%	-8.40%	11.50%	4.41%	-6.15%	14.84%
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	0.79%	5.02%	4.86%	5.71%	-8.31%	-1.68%	9.41%	13.94%	-2.40%	5.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBND achieves a -2.80% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 0.79% return.

IBND

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: -4.53%
• YTD: -2.80%
• 6M: -2.44%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: 5.46%
• 5Y*: -1.27%
• 10Y*: 0.50%

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: 1.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBND vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.

IBND

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF

BSCQ

Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

IBND vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBND

IBND Risk / Return Rank: 49
IBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
IBND Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
IBND Martin Ratio Rank: 43

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBND vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBND	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	5.39	-4.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	9.14	-7.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	2.82	-1.66
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	10.98	-9.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.91	73.48	-69.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBND vs. BSCQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the BSCQ Sharpe Ratio of 5.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBND and BSCQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBND	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	5.39	-4.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.48	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.59	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between IBND and BSCQ is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IBND vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

IBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than BSCQ's 4.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF	2.65%	2.49%	2.61%	2.08%	0.54%	0.38%	0.45%	0.67%	0.71%	0.34%	0.01%	0.01%
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.15%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IBND vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBND drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBND and BSCQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBND	BSCQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.62%	-16.50%	-19.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.75%	-0.41%	-6.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.32%	-13.02%	-21.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.03%	0.00%	-11.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.65%	-2.90%	-7.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	0.06%	+1.97%

Volatility

IBND vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.22%. This indicates that IBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBND	BSCQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	0.22%	+3.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.56%	0.45%	+5.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.92%	0.84%	+8.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.70%	3.32%	+6.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.94%	4.81%	+4.13%