PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBNAX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBNAX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBNAX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBNAX
Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund
-3.32%12.17%15.68%16.19%-2.76%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
-1.44%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBNAX achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's -1.44% return.


IBNAX

1D
2.19%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
-3.32%
6M
-3.01%
1Y
9.17%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
8.26%

FRGAX

1D
2.16%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
0.52%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBNAX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBNAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBNAX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBNAX
IBNAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IBNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IBNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBNAX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBNAXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

1.33

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.93

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.74

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.15

7.96

-2.82

IBNAX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBNAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBNAX and FRGAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBNAXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.33

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

1.27

-0.93

Correlation

The correlation between IBNAX and FRGAX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IBNAX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

IBNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than FRGAX's 2.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBNAX
Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund
3.21%3.10%1.86%1.11%26.49%11.58%6.76%7.70%11.85%4.62%2.31%6.20%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
2.03%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBNAX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBNAX drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBNAX and FRGAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBNAXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.04%

-11.77%

-40.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.42%

-8.53%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.39%

-5.02%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-1.62%

-8.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.87%

+0.10%

Volatility

IBNAX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) is 4.28%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that IBNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBNAXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

4.51%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.04%

7.04%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.25%

12.09%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.05%

10.33%

+9.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

10.33%

+6.29%