IBNAX vs. DVMHX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IBNAX (Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund) and DVMHX (Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - IBNAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Delaware Funds by Macquarie, while DVMHX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Delaware Funds by Macquarie. Over the past 10 years, IBNAX returned 9.28%/yr vs 2.41%/yr for DVMHX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. IBNAX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for DVMHX.

Performance

IBNAX vs. DVMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) and Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBNAX achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than DVMHX's 2.71% return. Over the past 10 years, IBNAX has outperformed DVMHX with an annualized return of 9.28%, while DVMHX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.41% annualized return.

IBNAX

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 6.36%
• 6M: 5.82%
• 1Y: 15.30%
• 3Y*: 14.27%
• 5Y*: 7.31%
• 10Y*: 9.28%

DVMHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.25%
• YTD: 2.71%
• 6M: 3.15%
• 1Y: 9.03%
• 3Y*: 4.88%
• 5Y*: 1.31%
• 10Y*: 2.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBNAX vs. DVMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBNAX Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund	6.36%	12.17%	15.68%	16.19%	-16.41%	16.22%	14.34%	22.13%	-3.32%	11.37%
DVMHX Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund	2.71%	4.22%	5.10%	5.24%	-10.69%	3.07%	3.95%	8.74%	0.79%	5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IBNAX and DVMHX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 1996	-0.02

The correlation between IBNAX and DVMHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IBNAX vs. DVMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBNAX

IBNAX Risk / Return Rank: 39
IBNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IBNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
IBNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
IBNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
IBNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

DVMHX

DVMHX Risk / Return Rank: 71
DVMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DVMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DVMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DVMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
DVMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBNAX vs. DVMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) and Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBNAX	DVMHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.48	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	3.82	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.59	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	2.59	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.17	9.48	-0.31

IBNAX vs. DVMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the DVMHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBNAX and DVMHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBNAX vs. DVMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBNAX drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, which is greater than DVMHX's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBNAX and DVMHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBNAX	DVMHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.04%	-15.73%	-36.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.42%	-3.55%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.91%	-7.86%	-3.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.04%	-15.56%	-12.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.04%	-15.56%	-12.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	0.00%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-1.96%	-8.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	0.97%	+0.79%

Volatility

IBNAX vs. DVMHX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX) at 0.94%. This indicates that IBNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBNAX	DVMHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	0.94%	+2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.12%	2.72%	+5.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.74%	3.73%	+6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.15%	5.02%	+15.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	4.68%	+12.02%

IBNAX vs. DVMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBNAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DVMHX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBNAX vs. DVMHX - Dividend Comparison

IBNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than DVMHX's 3.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DVMHX Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund	3.77%	4.95%	4.17%	3.12%	2.98%	2.40%	2.99%	3.70%	3.21%	3.34%	3.29%	3.47%
IBNAX Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund	2.55%	3.10%	1.86%	1.11%	26.49%	11.58%	6.76%	7.70%	11.85%	4.62%	2.31%	6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBNAX and DVMHX in my portfolio?

IBNAX and DVMHX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBNAX or DVMHX?

IBNAX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to DVMHX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBNAX dropped -52.04% vs DVMHX's -15.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DVMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.