PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBNAX vs. DDFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBNAX vs. DDFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) and Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBNAX achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly higher than DDFLX's 1.89% return. Over the past 10 years, IBNAX has outperformed DDFLX with an annualized return of 9.17%, while DDFLX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.41% annualized return.


IBNAX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.51%
6M
6.20%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
9.17%

DDFLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.59%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*
5.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBNAX vs. DDFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBNAX
Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund
6.51%12.17%15.68%16.19%-16.41%16.22%14.34%22.13%-3.32%11.37%
DDFLX
Delaware Floating Rate Fund
1.89%6.01%8.92%10.75%-0.62%5.46%3.17%10.69%1.26%4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IBNAX and DDFLX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2010

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBNAX vs. DDFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBNAX
IBNAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IBNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IBNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DDFLX
DDFLX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DDFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DDFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBNAX vs. DDFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) and Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBNAXDDFLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

2.77

-0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

6.81

-4.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

2.22

-0.88

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

5.63

-3.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.80

20.66

-10.86

IBNAX vs. DDFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the DDFLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBNAX and DDFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBNAXDDFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.77

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

2.16

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

1.55

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.37

-1.00

Drawdowns

IBNAX vs. DDFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBNAX drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, which is greater than DDFLX's maximum drawdown of -18.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBNAX and DDFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBNAXDDFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.04%

-18.09%

-33.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.42%

-1.11%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.91%

-2.05%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.04%

-5.18%

-22.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.04%

-18.09%

-9.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

0.00%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.48%

-0.67%

-9.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

0.30%

+1.42%

Volatility

IBNAX vs. DDFLX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX) at 0.61%. This indicates that IBNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBNAXDDFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

0.61%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

1.69%

+5.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.11%

2.26%

+6.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.09%

2.70%

+17.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

3.50%

+13.16%

IBNAX vs. DDFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBNAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DDFLX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBNAX vs. DDFLX - Dividend Comparison

IBNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than DDFLX's 6.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDFLX
Delaware Floating Rate Fund
6.79%7.21%8.62%7.17%5.04%3.96%4.89%6.54%5.73%4.33%2.09%2.34%
IBNAX
Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund
2.91%3.10%1.86%1.11%26.49%11.58%6.76%7.70%11.85%4.62%2.31%6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBNAX and DDFLX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBNAX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to DDFLX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBNAX dropped -52.04% vs DDFLX's -18.09%.

DDFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBNAX and DDFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer