PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVMHX vs. IVINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVMHX vs. IVINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX) and Delaware Ivy Global Growth Fund (IVINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVMHX achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly lower than IVINX's 8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, DVMHX has underperformed IVINX with an annualized return of 2.51%, while IVINX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.52% annualized return.


DVMHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.30%
6M
2.94%
1Y
9.28%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*
2.51%

IVINX

1D
0.12%
1M
3.38%
YTD
8.51%
6M
9.53%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
11.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVMHX vs. IVINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DVMHX
Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund
2.30%4.22%5.10%5.24%-10.69%3.07%3.95%8.74%0.79%5.97%
IVINX
Delaware Ivy Global Growth Fund
8.51%17.76%17.08%19.05%-18.81%17.34%20.55%25.63%-6.20%24.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DVMHX and IVINX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 1996

-0.07

The correlation between DVMHX and IVINX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVMHX vs. IVINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVMHX
DVMHX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DVMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DVMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IVINX
IVINX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IVINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVINX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IVINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVMHX vs. IVINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX) and Delaware Ivy Global Growth Fund (IVINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVMHXIVINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

1.43

+0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.60

2.11

+1.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.27

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

1.78

+0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.24

7.76

+1.47

DVMHX vs. IVINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVMHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the IVINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVMHX and IVINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVMHXIVINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

1.43

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.21

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.35

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.28

+0.84

Drawdowns

DVMHX vs. IVINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVMHX drawdown since its inception was -15.73%, smaller than the maximum IVINX drawdown of -70.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVMHX and IVINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVMHXIVINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

-70.19%

+54.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.55%

-10.74%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.86%

-16.82%

+8.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.56%

-45.82%

+30.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.56%

-45.82%

+30.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-2.28%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-20.40%

+18.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

2.46%

-1.49%

Volatility

DVMHX vs. IVINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX) is 1.46%, while Delaware Ivy Global Growth Fund (IVINX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that DVMHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVMHXIVINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

4.02%

-2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

11.10%

-8.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

13.48%

-9.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.01%

42.56%

-37.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

32.95%

-28.27%

DVMHX vs. IVINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVMHX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than IVINX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVMHX vs. IVINX - Dividend Comparison

DVMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than IVINX's 8.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVMHX
Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.78%4.95%4.17%3.12%2.98%2.40%2.99%3.70%3.21%3.34%3.29%3.47%
IVINX
Delaware Ivy Global Growth Fund
8.20%8.90%3.86%6.13%77.33%6.97%5.20%0.94%12.51%7.48%0.00%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVMHX and IVINX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVINX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to DVMHX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVMHX dropped -15.73% vs IVINX's -70.19%.

DVMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVMHX and IVINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer