PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBNAX vs. DGIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBNAX vs. DGIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBNAX achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than DGIFX's 17.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IBNAX has underperformed DGIFX with an annualized return of 9.17%, while DGIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.45% annualized return.


IBNAX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.51%
6M
6.20%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
9.17%

DGIFX

1D
0.76%
1M
6.56%
YTD
17.45%
6M
16.09%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBNAX vs. DGIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBNAX
Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund
6.51%12.17%15.68%16.19%-16.41%16.22%14.34%22.13%-3.32%11.37%
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
17.45%3.54%21.13%33.10%-18.35%9.59%24.07%23.97%-2.39%14.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IBNAX and DGIFX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2011

0.85

The correlation between IBNAX and DGIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBNAX vs. DGIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBNAX
IBNAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IBNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IBNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DGIFX
DGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBNAX vs. DGIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBNAXDGIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.55

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

7.92

+1.88

IBNAX vs. DGIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the DGIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBNAX and DGIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBNAXDGIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.80

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.50

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.67

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.71

-0.35

Drawdowns

IBNAX vs. DGIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBNAX drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, which is greater than DGIFX's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBNAX and DGIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBNAXDGIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.04%

-30.93%

-21.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.42%

-10.91%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.91%

-30.93%

+20.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.04%

-30.93%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.04%

-30.93%

+2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

0.00%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.48%

-5.90%

-4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

3.50%

-1.78%

Volatility

IBNAX vs. DGIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund (IBNAX) is 3.04%, while Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that IBNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBNAXDGIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

4.23%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

11.14%

-3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.11%

15.47%

-6.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.09%

21.11%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

18.66%

-2.00%

IBNAX vs. DGIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBNAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DGIFX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBNAX vs. DGIFX - Dividend Comparison

IBNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than DGIFX's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
7.02%8.29%20.95%2.78%2.21%11.12%10.09%3.53%3.74%4.29%0.00%0.00%
IBNAX
Delaware Ivy Balanced Fund
2.91%3.10%1.86%1.11%26.49%11.58%6.76%7.70%11.85%4.62%2.31%6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBNAX and DGIFX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGIFX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to IBNAX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBNAX dropped -52.04% vs DGIFX's -30.93%.

IBNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBNAX and DGIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer