IBMR vs. THYM
IBMR (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF) and THYM (T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index, while THYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. IBMR is passively managed, while THYM is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBMR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for THYM.
Performance
IBMR vs. THYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMR achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than THYM's 3.61% return.
IBMR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THYM
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 3.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMR vs. THYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.79% | 0.62% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 3.61% | 0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMR and THYM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMR vs. THYM — Risk / Return Rank
IBMR
THYM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBMR vs. THYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBMR | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBMR vs. THYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMR drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, which is greater than THYM's maximum drawdown of -2.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMR and THYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMR | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -2.93% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.24% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -0.47% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | — | — |
Volatility
IBMR vs. THYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMR | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76% | 4.31% | -2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.04% | 4.31% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.04% | 4.31% | -1.27% |
IBMR vs. THYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than THYM's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBMR vs. THYM - Dividend Comparison
IBMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than THYM's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.55% | 2.55% | 2.53% | 1.27% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 2.18% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMR and THYM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for THYM.
IBMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.18% for THYM.
IBMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while THYM is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: iShares and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMR and 0.32% for THYM.
Find the right allocation for IBMR and THYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer