IBM vs. BIL
IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) is a stock, while BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 10 years, IBM returned 11.04%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for BIL. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBM vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBM achieves a -10.06% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IBM has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 11.04%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.
IBM
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- -10.06%
- 6M
- -12.53%
- 1Y
- -8.20%
- 3Y*
- 30.81%
- 5Y*
- 17.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
IBM vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | -10.06% | 38.23% | 39.27% | 21.85% | 10.64% | 16.65% | -1.16% | 23.58% | -22.56% | -3.99% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.69% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBM and BIL is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBM vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
IBM
BIL
IBM vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBM | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -19.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -173.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 87.41 | -86.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 353.28 | -353.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 2,801.36 | -2,801.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBM vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBM drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBM and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBM | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.40% | -0.78% | -68.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.96% | -0.01% | -30.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.96% | -0.01% | -30.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.96% | -0.09% | -30.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | -0.21% | -40.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.13% | 0.00% | -20.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -0.26% | -19.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.79% | 0.00% | +14.79% |
Volatility
IBM vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a higher volatility of 20.10% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that IBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBM | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.10% | 0.07% | +20.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.49% | 0.14% | +35.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.10% | 0.20% | +39.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.37% | 0.26% | +27.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.65% | 0.26% | +26.39% |
Dividends
IBM vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.85% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2.56% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBM and BIL have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBM has higher volatility (20.10%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBM dropped -69.40% vs BIL's -0.78%.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.43 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBM and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer