IBLC vs. RSBY
IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. IBLC is passively managed, while RSBY is actively managed. Over the past year, IBLC returned 4.27% vs 18.35% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. IBLC charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.
Performance
IBLC vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBLC achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 19.01% return.
IBLC
- 1D
- -5.37%
- 1M
- -19.65%
- 6M
- -8.48%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBY
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 18.44%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 1Y
- 18.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.27% | 27.05% | 17.64% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 19.01% | -12.98% | -7.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBLC and RSBY is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBLC vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank
IBLC
RSBY
IBLC vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBLC | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.28 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 2.32 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | 5.39 | -5.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBLC vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and RSBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBLC | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.54% | -23.32% | -39.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.94% | -7.95% | -36.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.45% | -6.07% | -25.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.75% | -13.29% | -12.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.76% | 3.41% | +20.35% |
Volatility
IBLC vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a higher volatility of 12.09% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.17%. This indicates that IBLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBLC | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.09% | 3.17% | +8.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.56% | 8.39% | +33.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.74% | 11.40% | +44.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.31% | 13.34% | +50.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.31% | 13.34% | +50.97% |
IBLC vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBLC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBLC vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison
IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, more than RSBY's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 6.00% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 1.74% | 2.07% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBLC and RSBY have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBLC has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to RSBY (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBLC dropped -62.54% vs RSBY's -23.32%.
On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 18.35% vs 4.27% for IBLC. On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 18.35% return vs 4.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 6.00%, compared with 1.74% for RSBY.
IBLC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBLC and 0.98% for RSBY.
RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBLC and RSBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer