IBLC vs. EZPZ
IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - IBLC tracks the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index while EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBLC returned 17.60% vs -46.59% for EZPZ. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IBLC charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
IBLC vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBLC achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly higher than EZPZ's -30.76% return.
IBLC
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 17.60%
- 3Y*
- 26.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.35%
EZPZ
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- 6M
- -27.14%
- YTD
- -30.76%
- 1Y
- -46.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $118.67K | $153.22K | $218.96K | |
| $395.00K | $481.87K | $794.27K |
IBLC vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 5.99% | 22.81% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -30.76% | -10.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBLC and EZPZ is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IBLC and EZPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBLC vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
IBLC
EZPZ
IBLC vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBLC | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.83 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | -0.86 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | -1.31 | +1.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBLC vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBLC | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.54% | -56.63% | -5.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.94% | -56.63% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.32% | -53.31% | +22.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.78% | -25.14% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.44% | 37.10% | -12.66% |
Volatility
IBLC vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a higher volatility of 19.77% compared to Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) at 9.34%. This indicates that IBLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBLC | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.77% | 9.34% | +10.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.51% | 36.00% | +7.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.85% | 47.82% | +10.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.48% | 46.94% | +17.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.48% | 46.94% | +17.54% |
IBLC vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBLC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBLC vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 5.91% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBLC and EZPZ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBLC has higher volatility (19.77%) compared to EZPZ (9.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBLC dropped -62.54% vs EZPZ's -56.63%.
On 1-year performance, IBLC leads with 17.60% vs -46.59% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBLC has performed better with a 17.60% return vs -46.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index, while EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBLC and 0.19% for EZPZ.
IBLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBLC and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer