IBIT vs. XYLD
IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIT returned -40.63% vs 16.64% for XYLD. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBIT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
IBIT vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -27.41% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 4.83% return.
IBIT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -20.12%
- YTD
- -27.41%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -40.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 16.64%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
IBIT vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.41% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.83% | 8.02% | 18.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIT and XYLD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.32 |
The correlation between IBIT and XYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIT vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
IBIT
XYLD
IBIT vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIT | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.57 | -0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 3.16 | -3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 16.57 | -17.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIT vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIT | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.11% | -33.46% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.11% | -5.29% | -46.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.45% | -0.29% | -49.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.53% | -3.71% | -12.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.64% | 1.01% | +28.63% |
Volatility
IBIT vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a higher volatility of 12.07% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 2.17%. This indicates that IBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIT | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.07% | 2.17% | +9.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.45% | 5.71% | +28.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.10% | 6.79% | +37.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 11.25% | +39.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 14.22% | +36.04% |
IBIT vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIT vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.53% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIT and XYLD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to XYLD (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIT dropped -52.11% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 1-year performance, XYLD leads with 16.64% vs -40.63% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 16.64% return vs -40.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.53%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XYLD is Derivative Income. IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IBIT and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIT and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer