IBIT vs. EGLN.L
IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) and EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIT returned -40.63% vs 24.16% for EGLN.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IBIT vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBIT is traded in USD, while EGLN.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -27.41% return, which is significantly lower than EGLN.L's -2.27% return.
IBIT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -20.12%
- YTD
- -27.41%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -40.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -10.28%
- YTD
- -2.27%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 24.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
IBIT vs. EGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.41% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -2.27% | 65.63% | 27.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIT and EGLN.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIT vs. EGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBIT
EGLN.L
IBIT vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIT | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.19 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 1.06 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 3.23 | -4.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIT vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, smaller than the maximum EGLN.L drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and EGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIT | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.11% | -59.11% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.11% | -22.68% | -29.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.45% | -20.57% | -28.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.53% | -33.85% | +17.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.64% | 7.44% | +22.20% |
Volatility
IBIT vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a higher volatility of 12.07% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) at 7.25%. This indicates that IBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIT | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.07% | 7.25% | +4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.45% | 21.66% | +12.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.10% | 24.87% | +19.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 18.43% | +31.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 17.10% | +33.16% |
IBIT vs. EGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBIT and EGLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIT vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBIT nor EGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIT and EGLN.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBIT and EGLN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while EGLN.L is Gold. IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price.
Find the right allocation for IBIT and EGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer