IBIL vs. VTP
IBIL (iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBIL tracks the ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury TIPS Index while VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBIL charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.
Performance
IBIL vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IBIL having a 1.59% return and VTP slightly lower at 1.55%.
IBIL
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 6.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIL vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIL iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF | 1.59% | 3.04% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIL and VTP is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIL vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
IBIL
VTP
IBIL vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIL | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIL | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.31 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
IBIL vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIL drawdown since its inception was -5.28%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIL and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIL | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -1.92% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.30% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -0.52% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | — | — |
Volatility
IBIL vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIL | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.58% | 3.26% | +2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.20% | 3.26% | +4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.20% | 3.26% | +4.94% |
IBIL vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIL has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIL vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
IBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IBIL iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF | 3.47% | 2.93% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIL and VTP have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIL.
IBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
IBIL tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury TIPS Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIL and 0.05% for VTP.
Find the right allocation for IBIL and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer