PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIK vs. VTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIK vs. VTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIK achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than VTP's 1.55% return.


IBIK

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
1.45%
6M
0.91%
1Y
6.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTP

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIK vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIK and VTP is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIK vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIK
IBIK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IBIK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIK Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIK Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VTP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIK vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIKVTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

IBIK vs. VTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIKVTPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

1.31

-0.23

Drawdowns

IBIK vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIK drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIK and VTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIKVTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-1.92%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.30%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-0.52%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

Volatility

IBIK vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIKVTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.21%

3.26%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.34%

3.26%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.34%

3.26%

+2.08%

IBIK vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIK has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIK vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison

IBIK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IBIK and VTP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIK.

IBIK has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.

IBIK tracks iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIK and 0.05% for VTP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIK and VTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer