PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIK vs. IBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIK vs. IBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) and iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIK achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than IBIL's 1.24% return.


IBIK

1D
0.43%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.83%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIL

1D
0.54%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.14%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIK vs. IBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIK and IBIL is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.89

The correlation between IBIK and IBIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIK vs. IBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIK
IBIK Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IBIK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIK Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIK Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIL
IBIL Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIK vs. IBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) and iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBIKIBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.80

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

4.22

+1.39

IBIK vs. IBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIK Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the IBIL Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIK and IBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIK vs. IBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIK drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, which is greater than IBIL's maximum drawdown of -5.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIK and IBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIKIBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-5.28%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-2.76%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-1.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-1.46%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

1.18%

-0.42%

Volatility

IBIK vs. IBIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) and iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL) have volatilities of 1.63% and 1.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIKIBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

1.63%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

3.26%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.25%

5.63%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.36%

8.11%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

8.11%

-2.75%

IBIK vs. IBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBIK and IBIL have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIK vs. IBIL - Dividend Comparison

IBIK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than IBIL's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IBIK
iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF
3.75%4.43%2.67%
IBIL
iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF
3.48%2.93%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIK and IBIL have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIL has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to IBIK (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIK dropped -5.59% vs IBIL's -5.28%.

On 1-year performance, IBIL leads with 4.95% vs 4.28% for IBIK. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIL has performed better with a 4.95% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIK and IBIL have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBIK has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 3.48% for IBIL.

IBIK tracks iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS Index, while IBIL tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury TIPS Index.

IBIK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIK and IBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer