IBIK vs. RINF
IBIK (iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF) and RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBIK tracks the iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS Index while RINF tracks the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIK returned 6.15% vs 2.48% for RINF. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. IBIK charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RINF.
Performance
IBIK vs. RINF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIK achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than RINF's 2.37% return.
IBIK
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 6.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RINF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 2.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
IBIK vs. RINF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBIK iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF | 1.45% | 8.78% | 1.43% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 2.37% | 1.64% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIK and RINF is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2024 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIK vs. RINF — Risk / Return Rank
IBIK
RINF
IBIK vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIK | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.10 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 0.96 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | 1.83 | +6.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIK | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 0.56 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.08 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
IBIK vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIK drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIK and RINF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIK | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -43.51% | +37.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.50% | -2.60% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.66% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -16.45% | +15.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 1.37% | -0.65% |
Volatility
IBIK vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) have volatilities of 1.20% and 1.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIK | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 1.19% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 2.77% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 4.49% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.34% | 12.82% | -7.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.34% | 12.57% | -7.23% |
IBIK vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIK has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIK vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison
IBIK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, which matches RINF's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIK iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF | 3.73% | 4.43% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.70% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIK and RINF have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIK has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to RINF (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIK dropped -5.59% vs RINF's -43.51%.
On 1-year performance, IBIK leads with 6.15% vs 2.48% for RINF. On fees, IBIK is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIK has performed better with a 6.15% return vs 2.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIK is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
IBIK has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 3.70% for RINF.
IBIK tracks iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS Index, while RINF tracks FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIK and 0.30% for RINF.
IBIK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIK and RINF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer