PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIK vs. CPII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIK vs. CPII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) and Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIK achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than CPII's 2.97% return.


IBIK

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.77%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPII

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
2.97%
6M
2.83%
1Y
3.20%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIK vs. CPII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBIK
iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF
0.59%8.78%1.63%
CPII
Ionic Inflation Protection ETF
2.97%2.76%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIK and CPII is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2024

-0.24

The correlation between IBIK and CPII shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (all time) to -0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIK vs. CPII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIK
IBIK Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IBIK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIK Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIK Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CPII
CPII Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CPII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPII Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPII Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CPII Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPII Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIK vs. CPII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) and Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBIKCPIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.96

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

4.37

+1.29

IBIK vs. CPII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIK Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the CPII Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIK and CPII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIK vs. CPII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIK drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum CPII drawdown of -6.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIK and CPII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIKCPIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-6.40%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-1.64%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-1.64%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-1.61%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.73%

+0.02%

Volatility

IBIK vs. CPII - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) at 0.76%. This indicates that IBIK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIKCPIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

0.76%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

2.82%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23%

3.42%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.36%

5.90%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

5.90%

-0.54%

IBIK vs. CPII - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIK has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CPII's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBIK vs. CPII - Dividend Comparison

IBIK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than CPII's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CPII
Ionic Inflation Protection ETF
4.10%4.20%5.47%5.86%2.21%
IBIK
iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF
3.77%4.43%2.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIK and CPII have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIK has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to CPII (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIK dropped -5.59% vs CPII's -6.40%.

On 1-year performance, IBIK leads with 4.26% vs 3.20% for CPII. On fees, IBIK is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, CPII has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIK has performed better with a 4.26% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIK is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CPII.

CPII has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 3.77% for IBIK.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Ionic. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIK and 0.74% for CPII.

IBIK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIK and CPII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer