IBII vs. RINF
IBII (iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF) and RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBII tracks the ICE 2032 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index while RINF tracks the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBII returned 5.28% vs 3.13% for RINF. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. IBII charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RINF.
Performance
IBII vs. RINF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBII achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than RINF's 2.46% return.
IBII
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RINF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.45%
- 10Y*
- 4.70%
IBII vs. RINF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBII iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF | 1.63% | 8.65% | 1.21% | 4.85% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 2.46% | 1.64% | 9.79% | -4.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBII and RINF is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBII vs. RINF — Risk / Return Rank
IBII
RINF
IBII vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBII | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.12 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 1.21 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 2.31 | +7.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBII | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 0.71 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.08 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
IBII vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBII drawdown since its inception was -4.65%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBII and RINF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBII | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -43.51% | +38.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.98% | -2.60% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.57% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -16.45% | +15.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 1.36% | -0.78% |
Volatility
IBII vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) is 0.89%, while ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that IBII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBII | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 1.17% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.29% | 2.78% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42% | 4.49% | -1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 12.82% | -7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 12.57% | -7.15% |
IBII vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBII has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBII vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison
IBII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than RINF's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBII iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF | 4.05% | 4.80% | 4.76% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.70% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBII and RINF have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RINF has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to IBII (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBII dropped -4.65% vs RINF's -43.51%.
On 1-year performance, IBII leads with 5.28% vs 3.13% for RINF. On fees, IBII is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBII has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBII has performed better with a 5.28% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBII is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
IBII has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 3.70% for RINF.
IBII tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while RINF tracks FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBII and 0.30% for RINF.
IBII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBII and RINF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer