IBIH vs. VTP
IBIH (iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBIH tracks the ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index while VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBIH charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.
Performance
IBIH vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIH achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 1.55% return.
IBIH
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIH vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 1.68% | 2.34% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIH and VTP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIH vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
IBIH
VTP
IBIH vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIH | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIH | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
IBIH vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIH and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIH | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -1.92% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.30% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -0.52% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility
IBIH vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIH | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16% | 3.26% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 3.26% | +1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 3.26% | +1.67% |
IBIH vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIH vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
IBIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 3.90% | 4.68% | 4.34% | 0.70% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IBIH and VTP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIH.
IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
IBIH tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIH and 0.05% for VTP.
Find the right allocation for IBIH and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer