PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIH vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIH vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIH achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.


IBIH

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.29%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
0.06%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.70%
6M
2.79%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIH vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIH and RBIL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIH vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIH
IBIH Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IBIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIH Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIH Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIH vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIHRBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

2.39

-1.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

17.00

-13.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

70.66

-59.75

IBIH vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIH Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIH and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIHRBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

5.01

-3.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

4.28

-3.03

Drawdowns

IBIH vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIH and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIHRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-0.50%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

-0.27%

-1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-0.06%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.07%

+0.43%

Volatility

IBIH vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that IBIH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIHRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

0.30%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.09%

0.79%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16%

0.92%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

1.05%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.93%

1.05%

+3.88%

IBIH vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIH vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

IBIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF
3.90%4.68%4.34%0.70%
RBIL
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF
4.60%3.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIH and RBIL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIH has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIH dropped -3.94% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

On 1-year performance, IBIH leads with 5.49% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, IBIH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIH has performed better with a 5.49% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 3.90% for IBIH.

IBIH tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIH and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIH and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer