IBIG vs. WIP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP).
IBIG and WIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBIG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. It was launched on Sep 19, 2023. WIP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the FTSE International Inflation-Linked Securities Select (USD). It was launched on Mar 13, 2008. Both IBIG and WIP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IBIG vs. WIP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBIG vs. WIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 0.60% | 7.90% | 2.60% | 4.26% |
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 1.75% | 15.18% | -8.71% | 8.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIG achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than WIP's 1.75% return.
IBIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WIP
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- 11.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- -0.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBIG vs. WIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than WIP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IBIG vs. WIP — Risk / Return Rank
IBIG
WIP
IBIG vs. WIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIG | WIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 1.72 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 2.40 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.67 | 7.08 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIG | WIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 0.11 | +1.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIG and WIP is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IBIG vs. WIP - Dividend Comparison
IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than WIP's 5.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 3.93% | 4.70% | 4.15% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 5.32% | 5.51% | 6.06% | 6.54% | 11.15% | 4.63% | 1.59% | 2.49% | 4.05% | 1.91% | 1.27% | 1.14% |
Drawdowns
IBIG vs. WIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum WIP drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and WIP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIG | WIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -29.60% | +26.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -5.16% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -6.22% | +5.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -8.62% | +7.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | 1.75% | -1.15% |
Volatility
IBIG vs. WIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) is 1.01%, while SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that IBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBIG | WIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 4.25% | -3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.71% | 6.05% | -4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33% | 9.51% | -6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 11.39% | -7.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 10.12% | -5.73% |