IBIG vs. QPUX
IBIG (iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF) and QPUX (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIG is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while QPUX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. IBIG is passively managed, while QPUX is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. IBIG charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for QPUX.
Performance
IBIG vs. QPUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIG achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than QPUX's -48.88% return.
IBIG
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QPUX
- 1D
- -11.28%
- 1M
- -45.46%
- YTD
- -48.88%
- 6M
- -57.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIG vs. QPUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 1.12% | 1.02% |
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | -48.88% | -55.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIG and QPUX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIG vs. QPUX — Risk / Return Rank
IBIG
QPUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIG vs. QPUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIG | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIG vs. QPUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum QPUX drawdown of -94.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and QPUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIG | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -94.73% | +91.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -89.86% | +88.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -69.17% | +68.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | — | — |
Volatility
IBIG vs. QPUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIG | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67% | 201.78% | -199.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 201.78% | -197.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 201.78% | -197.51% |
IBIG vs. QPUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QPUX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIG vs. QPUX - Dividend Comparison
IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, while QPUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 3.91% | 4.70% | 4.15% | 0.78% |
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIG and QPUX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBIG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBIG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QPUX.
IBIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for QPUX.
IBIG is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while QPUX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIG and 1.29% for QPUX.
Find the right allocation for IBIG and QPUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer