IBIG vs. QPUX
IBIG (iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF) and QPUX (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIG is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while QPUX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. IBIG is passively managed, while QPUX is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. IBIG charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for QPUX.
Performance
IBIG vs. QPUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIG achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than QPUX's -9.71% return.
IBIG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QPUX
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- 48.72%
- YTD
- -9.71%
- 6M
- -45.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIG vs. QPUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 1.60% | 0.99% |
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | -9.71% | -15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIG and QPUX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIG vs. QPUX — Risk / Return Rank
IBIG
QPUX
IBIG vs. QPUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIG | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIG | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | -0.15 | +1.57 |
Drawdowns
IBIG vs. QPUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum QPUX drawdown of -94.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and QPUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIG | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -94.73% | +91.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -82.09% | +81.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -63.57% | +62.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | — | — |
Volatility
IBIG vs. QPUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIG | QPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61% | 194.31% | -191.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.28% | 194.31% | -190.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.28% | 194.31% | -190.03% |
IBIG vs. QPUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QPUX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIG vs. QPUX - Dividend Comparison
IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, while QPUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 3.89% | 4.70% | 4.15% | 0.78% |
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIG and QPUX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBIG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBIG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QPUX.
IBIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 0.00% for QPUX.
IBIG is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while QPUX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIG and 1.29% for QPUX.
Find the right allocation for IBIG and QPUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer