PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIG vs. BOBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIG vs. BOBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIG achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than BOBP's 24.96% return.


IBIG

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.42%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOBP

1D
0.43%
1M
9.07%
YTD
24.96%
6M
24.49%
1Y
34.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIG vs. BOBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIG and BOBP is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIG vs. BOBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIG
IBIG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BOBP
BOBP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BOBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BOBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOBP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIG vs. BOBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIGBOBPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

2.65

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

11.75

+0.93

IBIG vs. BOBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the BOBP Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIG and BOBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIGBOBPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.88

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

1.89

-0.46

Drawdowns

IBIG vs. BOBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum BOBP drawdown of -13.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and BOBP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIGBOBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-13.06%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-13.06%

+11.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

0.00%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-1.63%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

2.95%

-2.55%

Volatility

IBIG vs. BOBP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) is 0.62%, while CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that IBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIGBOBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

7.11%

-6.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.70%

16.31%

-14.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62%

18.46%

-15.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.29%

18.27%

-13.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.29%

18.27%

-13.98%

IBIG vs. BOBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BOBP's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBIG vs. BOBP - Dividend Comparison

IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than BOBP's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BOBP
CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF
2.65%3.31%0.00%0.00%
IBIG
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF
3.89%4.70%4.15%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIG and BOBP have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOBP has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to IBIG (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIG dropped -3.21% vs BOBP's -13.06%.

On 1-year performance, BOBP leads with 34.52% vs 5.02% for IBIG. On fees, IBIG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BOBP has performed better with a 34.52% return vs 5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BOBP.

IBIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 2.65% for BOBP.

IBIG is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BOBP is Large Cap Blend Equities. IBIG tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while BOBP tracks CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIG and 0.70% for BOBP.

IBIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIG and BOBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer