IBID vs. NLR
IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBID returned 3.58% vs -2.28% for NLR. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. IBID charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
IBID vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBID achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -13.99% return.
IBID
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.38%
NLR
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -28.16%
- YTD
- -13.99%
- 1Y
- -2.28%
- 3Y*
- 23.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $730.73K | $757.79K | $746.53K | |
| $43.05M | $48.38M | $60.74M |
IBID vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 2.41% | 5.66% | 4.71% | 2.61% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -13.99% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 6.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBID and NLR is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.02 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IBID and NLR has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBID vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
IBID
NLR
IBID vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBID | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.02 | +0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.26 | -0.12 | +7.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.58 | -0.26 | +25.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBID vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBID drawdown since its inception was -1.28%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBID and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBID | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -65.05% | +63.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.55% | -37.52% | +36.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -35.01% | +34.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -35.67% | +35.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.16% | 17.42% | -17.26% |
Volatility
IBID vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) is 0.33%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that IBID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBID | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 12.90% | -12.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.92% | 32.42% | -31.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22% | 43.80% | -42.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 30.13% | -27.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 24.58% | -22.37% |
IBID vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBID has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBID vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than NLR's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 4.90% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.96% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBID and NLR have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to IBID (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBID dropped -1.28% vs NLR's -65.05%.
On 1-year performance, IBID leads with 3.58% vs -2.28% for NLR. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBID has performed better with a 3.58% return vs -2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
IBID has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.96% for NLR.
IBID is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while NLR is Uranium. IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBID and 0.56% for NLR.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBID and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer