PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIC vs. TIPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIC vs. TIPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) and Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIC achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly higher than TIPB's 2.45% return.


IBIC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
6M
2.37%
YTD
2.67%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.24%

TIPB

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.08%
6M
1.97%
YTD
2.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.04M$809.24K$530.96K
$2.11K$8.84K$25.27K

IBIC vs. TIPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIC and TIPB is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIC vs. TIPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TIPB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBIC vs. TIPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) and Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBICTIPBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

51.54

IBIC vs. TIPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIC vs. TIPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIC drawdown since its inception was -0.90%, smaller than the maximum TIPB drawdown of -1.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIC and TIPB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBICTIPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-1.32%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.29%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-0.38%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

Volatility

IBIC vs. TIPB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBICTIPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89%

2.75%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.54%

2.75%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.54%

2.75%

-1.21%

IBIC vs. TIPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBIC and TIPB have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIC vs. TIPB - Dividend Comparison

IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than TIPB's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
4.62%4.43%4.65%0.83%
TIPB
Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF
5.96%1.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIC and TIPB have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBIC and TIPB have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

TIPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.96%, compared with 4.62% for IBIC.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIC and TIPB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer