IBHM vs. SCYB
IBHM (iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IBHM tracks the Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index while SCYB tracks the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBHM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.
Performance
IBHM vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBHM
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 7.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHM vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 2.83% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 2.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHM and SCYB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHM vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
IBHM
SCYB
IBHM vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHM) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBHM | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.97 | 1.70 | +1.27 |
Drawdowns
IBHM vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHM drawdown since its inception was -1.67%, smaller than the maximum SCYB drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHM and SCYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHM | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -4.92% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.12% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.43% | -0.52% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.54% | — |
Volatility
IBHM vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHM | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.37% | 3.75% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.37% | 5.13% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.37% | 5.13% | +0.24% |
IBHM vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHM vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
IBHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than SCYB's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.92% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IBHM and SCYB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHM.
SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 1.08% for IBHM.
IBHM tracks Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index, while SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHM and 0.03% for SCYB.
Find the right allocation for IBHM and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer