IBHM vs. BSJR
IBHM (iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IBHM tracks the Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index while BSJR tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBHM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJR.
Performance
IBHM vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBHM
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
IBHM vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 2.84% |
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHM and BSJR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHM vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank
IBHM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSJR
IBHM vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHM) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHM | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHM vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHM drawdown since its inception was -1.67%, smaller than the maximum BSJR drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHM and BSJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHM | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -22.58% | +20.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.04% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -3.20% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.24% | — |
Volatility
IBHM vs. BSJR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHM | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.92% | 1.96% | +2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 6.73% | -1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 9.30% | -4.38% |
IBHM vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJR's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHM vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison
IBHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than BSJR's 5.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.65% | 6.19% | 6.75% | 6.48% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 4.53% | 1.20% |
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHM and BSJR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBHM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBHM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJR.
BSJR has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 1.57% for IBHM.
IBHM tracks Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index, while BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHM and 0.42% for BSJR.
Find the right allocation for IBHM and BSJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer