IBHJ vs. YLD
IBHJ (iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and YLD (Principal Active High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. IBHJ is passively managed, while YLD is actively managed. Over the past year, IBHJ returned 7.29% vs 7.36% for YLD. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBHJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for YLD.
Performance
IBHJ vs. YLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHJ achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than YLD's 2.83% return.
IBHJ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 7.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YLD
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- 7.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.74%
- 10Y*
- 5.80%
IBHJ vs. YLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.50% | 9.28% | 7.32% | 8.37% |
YLD Principal Active High Yield ETF | 2.83% | 6.55% | 9.19% | 7.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHJ and YLD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IBHJ and YLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHJ vs. YLD — Risk / Return Rank
IBHJ
YLD
IBHJ vs. YLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBHJ | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.74 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.41 | 12.96 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBHJ | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.71 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.65 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
IBHJ vs. YLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHJ drawdown since its inception was -4.93%, smaller than the maximum YLD drawdown of -28.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHJ and YLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHJ | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -28.34% | +23.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -1.98% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.37% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -2.70% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 0.57% | -0.03% |
Volatility
IBHJ vs. YLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) is 1.09%, while Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that IBHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHJ | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 1.32% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.20% | 3.51% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.07% | 4.34% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.95% | 6.40% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.95% | 8.21% | -2.26% |
IBHJ vs. YLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than YLD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHJ vs. YLD - Dividend Comparison
IBHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, less than YLD's 7.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.68% | 6.64% | 6.87% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YLD Principal Active High Yield ETF | 7.27% | 7.33% | 7.12% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 3.92% | 4.40% | 4.81% | 5.42% | 6.28% | 4.47% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHJ and YLD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YLD has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to IBHJ (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHJ dropped -4.93% vs YLD's -28.34%.
On 1-year performance, YLD leads with 7.36% vs 7.29% for IBHJ. On fees, IBHJ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHJ has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YLD has performed better with a 7.36% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHJ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for YLD.
YLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 6.68% for IBHJ.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHJ and 0.39% for YLD.
IBHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBHJ and YLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer