IBHJ vs. HYBL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBHJ (iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and HYBL (SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. IBHJ is passively managed, while HYBL is actively managed. Over the past year, IBHJ returned 7.29% vs 6.35% for HYBL. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBHJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for HYBL.

Performance

IBHJ vs. HYBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHJ achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than HYBL's 1.11% return.

IBHJ

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 2.06%
• 1Y: 7.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYBL

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 6.35%
• 3Y*: 8.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHJ vs. HYBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF	1.50%	9.28%	7.32%	8.37%
HYBL SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF	1.11%	7.78%	9.12%	7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHJ and HYBL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023	0.71

The correlation between IBHJ and HYBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IBHJ vs. HYBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHJ

IBHJ Risk / Return Rank: 59
IBHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
IBHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
IBHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
IBHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IBHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 72

HYBL

HYBL Risk / Return Rank: 68
HYBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
HYBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
HYBL Omega Ratio Rank: 80
HYBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
HYBL Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHJ vs. HYBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBHJ	HYBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.40	-0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	3.66	-1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.48	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	2.64	+0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.41	9.71	+3.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBHJ vs. HYBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the HYBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHJ and HYBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBHJ	HYBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	2.40	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.53	1.25	+0.28

Drawdowns

IBHJ vs. HYBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHJ drawdown since its inception was -4.93%, smaller than the maximum HYBL drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHJ and HYBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBHJ	HYBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-8.46%	+3.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	-2.41%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.20%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.62%	-1.35%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.54%	0.66%	-0.12%

Volatility

IBHJ vs. HYBL - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL) at 0.68%. This indicates that IBHJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBHJ	HYBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	0.68%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.20%	2.14%	+1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.07%	2.66%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.95%	4.57%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.95%	4.57%	+1.38%

IBHJ vs. HYBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYBL's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBHJ vs. HYBL - Dividend Comparison

IBHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, less than HYBL's 7.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HYBL SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF	7.12%	7.22%	7.88%	7.93%	5.10%
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF	6.68%	6.64%	6.87%	3.66%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBHJ and HYBL in my portfolio?

IBHJ and HYBL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBHJ or HYBL?

IBHJ has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to HYBL (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHJ dropped -4.93% vs HYBL's -8.46%.

Which ETF is better, IBHJ or HYBL?

On 1-year performance, IBHJ leads with 7.29% vs 6.35% for HYBL. On fees, IBHJ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYBL has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBHJ or HYBL?

Over the 1-year period, IBHJ has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 6.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBHJ or HYBL?

IBHJ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HYBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBHJ or HYBL?

HYBL has the higher dividend yield at 7.12%, compared with 6.68% for IBHJ.

What is the main difference between IBHJ and HYBL?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHJ and 0.70% for HYBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.