IBHJ vs. SPHY
IBHJ (iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and SPHY (SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IBHJ tracks the Bloomberg 2030 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SPHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBHJ returned 9.02%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for SPHY. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBHJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPHY.
Performance
IBHJ vs. SPHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHJ achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than SPHY's 1.85% return.
IBHJ
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 6.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHY
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- 9.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 5.16%
IBHJ vs. SPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.97% | 9.28% | 7.32% | 8.37% |
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 1.85% | 8.59% | 8.54% | 8.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHJ and SPHY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IBHJ and SPHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHJ vs. SPHY — Risk / Return Rank
IBHJ
SPHY
IBHJ vs. SPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHJ | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.74 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 12.33 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHJ vs. SPHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHJ drawdown since its inception was -4.93%, smaller than the maximum SPHY drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHJ and SPHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHJ | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -21.97% | +17.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -2.41% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.93% | -4.85% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.17% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -2.28% | +1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.53% | +0.02% |
Volatility
IBHJ vs. SPHY - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) at 0.96%. This indicates that IBHJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHJ | SPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 0.96% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.29% | 2.97% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 3.72% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 7.18% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 7.86% | -1.94% |
IBHJ vs. SPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHY's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHJ vs. SPHY - Dividend Comparison
IBHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, less than SPHY's 7.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.65% | 6.64% | 6.87% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 7.24% | 7.38% | 7.80% | 7.30% | 6.47% | 5.13% | 5.63% | 5.73% | 4.09% | 4.41% | 4.27% | 4.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IBHJ and SPHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IBHJ has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to SPHY (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHJ dropped -4.93% vs SPHY's -21.97%.
On 3-year performance, SPHY leads with 9.19% vs 9.02% for IBHJ. On fees, SPHY is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPHY has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHY is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHJ.
SPHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.24%, compared with 6.65% for IBHJ.
IBHJ tracks Bloomberg 2030 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHJ and 0.05% for SPHY.
SPHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBHJ and SPHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer