IBHJ vs. FDGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBHJ (iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and FDGRX (Fidelity Growth Company Fund) are both funds - IBHJ is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2030 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FDGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, IBHJ returned 7.29% vs 48.48% for FDGRX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBHJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FDGRX.

Performance

IBHJ vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHJ achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than FDGRX's 23.73% return.

IBHJ

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 2.06%
• 1Y: 7.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDGRX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 8.79%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 19.90%
• 1Y: 48.48%
• 3Y*: 31.67%
• 5Y*: 17.53%
• 10Y*: 23.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHJ vs. FDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF	1.50%	9.28%	7.32%	8.37%
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	23.73%	18.54%	37.18%	11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHJ and FDGRX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023	0.54

The correlation between IBHJ and FDGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IBHJ vs. FDGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHJ

IBHJ Risk / Return Rank: 59
IBHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
IBHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
IBHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
IBHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IBHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 72

FDGRX

FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHJ vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBHJ	FDGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.74	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	3.35	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.46	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	4.00	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.41	15.03	-1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBHJ vs. FDGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the FDGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHJ and FDGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBHJ	FDGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	2.74	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.53	0.70	+0.83

Drawdowns

IBHJ vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHJ drawdown since its inception was -4.93%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHJ and FDGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBHJ	FDGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-71.62%	+66.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	-12.60%	+10.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	0.00%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.62%	-15.91%	+15.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.54%	3.34%	-2.80%

Volatility

IBHJ vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) is 1.09%, while Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that IBHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBHJ	FDGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	4.40%	-3.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.20%	14.41%	-11.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.07%	18.44%	-14.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.95%	23.93%	-17.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.95%	23.39%	-17.44%

IBHJ vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBHJ vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison

IBHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, while FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.86%	3.83%	7.20%	10.67%	8.86%	3.84%	6.38%	4.73%	6.16%	3.92%
IBHJ iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF	6.68%	6.64%	6.87%	3.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBHJ and FDGRX in my portfolio?

IBHJ and FDGRX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBHJ or FDGRX?

FDGRX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to IBHJ (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHJ dropped -4.93% vs FDGRX's -71.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.