PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHJ vs. BSJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHJ vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHJ achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than BSJR's 1.11% return.


IBHJ

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.06%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSJR

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.05%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.70%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHJ vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBHJ
iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.50%9.28%7.32%8.37%
BSJR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.11%7.41%7.15%8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHJ and BSJR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.85

The correlation between IBHJ and BSJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHJ vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHJ
IBHJ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IBHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJR
BSJR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BSJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHJ vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBHJBSJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.45

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

4.13

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.41

19.02

-5.61

IBHJ vs. BSJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the BSJR Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHJ and BSJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBHJBSJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.27

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.43

+1.10

Drawdowns

IBHJ vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHJ drawdown since its inception was -4.93%, smaller than the maximum BSJR drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHJ and BSJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHJBSJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-22.58%

+17.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-1.16%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.27%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-3.25%

+2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.25%

+0.29%

Volatility

IBHJ vs. BSJR - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHJ) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) at 0.57%. This indicates that IBHJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHJBSJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.57%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

1.45%

+1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

2.12%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.95%

6.73%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.95%

9.37%

-3.42%

IBHJ vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJR's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBHJ vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison

IBHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than BSJR's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSJR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.75%6.19%6.75%6.48%5.37%4.49%4.53%1.20%
IBHJ
iShares iBonds 2030 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.68%6.64%6.87%3.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBHJ and BSJR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBHJ has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to BSJR (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHJ dropped -4.93% vs BSJR's -22.58%.

On 1-year performance, IBHJ leads with 7.29% vs 4.78% for BSJR. On fees, IBHJ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BSJR has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBHJ has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 4.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHJ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJR.

IBHJ has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 5.75% for BSJR.

IBHJ tracks Bloomberg 2030 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHJ and 0.42% for BSJR.

BSJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHJ and BSJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer