PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHH vs. QHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHH vs. QHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHH achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than QHY's 1.92% return.


IBHH

1D
0.13%
1M
0.22%
6M
1.75%
YTD
2.32%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.23%

QHY

1D
0.25%
1M
0.02%
6M
1.30%
YTD
1.92%
1Y
5.76%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
4.84%
ALL TIME*
4.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.12M$2.34M$2.50M
$872.17K$722.77K$795.01K

IBHH vs. QHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBHH
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF
2.32%8.02%7.53%12.87%-6.70%
QHY
WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund
1.92%9.61%5.92%10.12%-7.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHH and QHY is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2022

0.86

The correlation between IBHH and QHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHH vs. QHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBHH
IBHH Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IBHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHH Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QHY
QHY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBHH vs. QHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBHHQHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.30

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

2.09

+2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.57

9.56

+8.00

IBHH vs. QHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHH Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the QHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHH and QHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBHH vs. QHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHH drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum QHY drawdown of -22.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHH and QHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHHQHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.05%

-22.74%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-2.77%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

-4.58%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-2.71%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

0.60%

-0.29%

Volatility

IBHH vs. QHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) is 0.61%, while WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY) has a volatility of 0.93%. This indicates that IBHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHHQHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

0.93%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.14%

2.94%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74%

3.68%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

7.58%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.13%

8.17%

-1.04%

IBHH vs. QHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QHY's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBHH vs. QHY - Dividend Comparison

IBHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.22%, which matches QHY's 6.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IBHH
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.22%6.39%6.93%6.65%5.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QHY
WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund
6.26%6.26%6.40%6.11%5.44%4.09%4.80%5.21%5.93%6.47%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBHH and QHY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QHY has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to IBHH (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHH dropped -12.05% vs QHY's -22.74%.

On 3-year performance, IBHH leads with 8.29% vs 7.79% for QHY. On fees, IBHH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHH has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IBHH has performed better with a 8.29% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QHY.

QHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 6.22% for IBHH.

IBHH tracks Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QHY tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHH and 0.38% for QHY.

IBHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHH and QHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer