QHY vs. CXRN
QHY (WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund) and CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index, while CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium. QHY is passively managed, while CXRN is actively managed. Over the past year, QHY returned 7.29% vs -23.31% for CXRN. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. QHY charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CXRN.
Performance
QHY vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QHY achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -13.42% return.
QHY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 7.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
CXRN
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- -21.78%
- YTD
- -13.42%
- 6M
- -14.31%
- 1Y
- -23.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHY vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 1.46% | 9.61% | -0.63% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -13.42% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between QHY and CXRN is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QHY vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank
QHY
CXRN
QHY vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.91 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | -0.93 | +3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | -1.67 | +13.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | -0.64 | +2.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | -0.61 | +1.22 |
Drawdowns
QHY vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QHY drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, smaller than the maximum CXRN drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHY and CXRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.74% | -46.71% | +23.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -25.27% | +22.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -46.16% | +46.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -30.08% | +27.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 13.97% | -13.36% |
Volatility
QHY vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY) is 1.08%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that QHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QHY | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 15.39% | -14.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 26.75% | -23.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 36.32% | -32.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 36.90% | -29.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.20% | 36.90% | -28.70% |
QHY vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
QHY has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CXRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QHY vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison
QHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than CXRN's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.61% | 3.30% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 6.26% | 6.26% | 6.40% | 6.11% | 5.44% | 4.09% | 4.80% | 5.21% | 5.93% | 6.47% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QHY and CXRN have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.39%) compared to QHY (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QHY dropped -22.74% vs CXRN's -46.71%.
On 1-year performance, QHY leads with 7.29% vs -23.31% for CXRN. On fees, QHY is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, QHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QHY has performed better with a 7.29% return vs -23.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QHY is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
QHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 2.61% for CXRN.
QHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CXRN is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QHY and 0.95% for CXRN.
QHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QHY and CXRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer