PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHH vs. BBEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHH vs. BBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHH achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than BBEM's 23.17% return.


IBHH

1D
0.04%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.29%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
10Y*

BBEM

1D
0.30%
1M
4.34%
YTD
23.17%
6M
25.34%
1Y
45.68%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHH vs. BBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBHH
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.66%8.02%7.53%8.16%
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
23.17%32.43%5.61%6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHH and BBEM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023

0.46

The correlation between IBHH and BBEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHH vs. BBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHH
IBHH Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IBHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHH Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BBEM
BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHH vs. BBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBHHBBEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

3.36

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.84

12.61

+7.23

IBHH vs. BBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHH Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the BBEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHH and BBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBHH vs. BBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHH drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum BBEM drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHH and BBEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHHBBEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.05%

-17.42%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-13.12%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

-17.42%

+12.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-4.30%

+4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-3.72%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

3.49%

-3.18%

Volatility

IBHH vs. BBEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) is 0.70%, while JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) has a volatility of 10.58%. This indicates that IBHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHHBBEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

10.58%

-9.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.10%

19.04%

-16.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84%

21.07%

-18.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

18.01%

-10.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.23%

18.01%

-10.78%

IBHH vs. BBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBHH vs. BBEM - Dividend Comparison

IBHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than BBEM's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.74%5.86%2.73%1.94%0.00%
IBHH
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.27%6.39%6.93%6.65%5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBHH and BBEM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBEM has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to IBHH (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHH dropped -12.05% vs BBEM's -17.42%.

On 3-year performance, BBEM leads with 20.75% vs 8.45% for IBHH. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IBHH has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BBEM has performed better with a 20.75% return vs 8.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHH.

IBHH has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 4.74% for BBEM.

IBHH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BBEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. IBHH tracks Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BBEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHH and 0.15% for BBEM.

IBHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHH and BBEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer