PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBEM vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBEM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEM achieves a 29.51% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return.


BBEM

1D
0.32%
1M
8.39%
YTD
29.51%
6M
29.97%
1Y
54.15%
3Y*
23.89%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBEM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
29.51%32.43%5.61%6.01%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%16.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEM and VOO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023

0.67

The correlation between BBEM and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBEM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEM
BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBEMVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

3.02

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.54

13.58

+1.96

BBEM vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEM and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBEM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEM drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEM and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBEMVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.42%

-33.99%

+16.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-8.90%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.42%

-18.69%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.74%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-3.68%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

1.98%

+1.51%

Volatility

BBEM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) has a higher volatility of 10.85% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that BBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBEMVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.85%

4.60%

+6.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.58%

9.73%

+9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.60%

12.39%

+9.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

16.90%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

18.05%

+0.13%

BBEM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBEM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

BBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.50%5.86%2.73%1.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBEM and VOO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBEM has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEM dropped -17.42% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, BBEM leads with 23.89% vs 21.36% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BBEM has performed better with a 23.89% return vs 21.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BBEM.

BBEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.

BBEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VOO is S&P 500. BBEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBEM and 0.03% for VOO.

BBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBEM and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer