PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGY.L vs. EIMI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGY.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGY.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBGY.L is traded in GBP, while EIMI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIMI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGY.L achieves a -4.44% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 18.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IBGY.L has underperformed EIMI.L with an annualized return of -0.02%, while EIMI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.


IBGY.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
-2.48%
6M
-4.06%
YTD
-4.44%
1Y
-2.82%
3Y*
2.31%
5Y*
-1.77%
10Y*
-0.02%

EIMI.L

1D
-1.33%
1M
-6.90%
6M
12.65%
YTD
18.15%
1Y
33.21%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGY.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBGY.L
iShares € Govt Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-4.44%7.76%-2.63%4.85%-10.06%-8.35%8.45%-0.79%1.40%3.93%
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
18.15%22.75%9.23%5.48%-10.12%0.29%15.31%11.94%-9.09%25.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGY.L and EIMI.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2014

0.09

The correlation between IBGY.L and EIMI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (5 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGY.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGY.L
IBGY.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IBGY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

EIMI.L
EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGY.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGY.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBGY.LEIMI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.31

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

3.12

-3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

9.00

-10.04

IBGY.L vs. EIMI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGY.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGY.L and EIMI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBGY.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGY.L drawdown since its inception was -22.02%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGY.L and EIMI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGY.LEIMI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.02%

-31.70%

+9.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.89%

-10.58%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.89%

-15.79%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.81%

-21.19%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.02%

-26.10%

+4.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.22%

-9.57%

-5.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-8.66%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.68%

-0.98%

Volatility

IBGY.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Govt Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGY.L) is 1.44%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that IBGY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGY.LEIMI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

8.66%

-7.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

18.40%

-13.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.35%

20.32%

-14.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

17.17%

-10.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.51%

18.54%

-11.03%

IBGY.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGY.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBGY.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison

IBGY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBGY.L
iShares € Govt Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.34%2.60%2.59%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.51%0.34%0.22%0.48%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBGY.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EIMI.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EIMI.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IBGY.L.

IBGY.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IBGY.L tracks iShares € Govt Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist), while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IBGY.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGY.L and EIMI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer