IBGM vs. TLT
IBGM (iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from iShares - IBGM tracks the ICE 2056 Maturity US Treasury Index while TLT tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IBGM charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
IBGM vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBGM
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- -1.69%
- 5Y*
- -6.66%
- 10Y*
- -2.07%
IBGM vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBGM iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF | 1.45% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGM and TLT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGM vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
IBGM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TLT
IBGM vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF (IBGM) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBGM | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBGM vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGM drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGM and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGM | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -48.35% | +43.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -39.66% | +38.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -13.89% | +12.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.20% | — |
Volatility
IBGM vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGM | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.64% | 9.58% | -0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.64% | 15.82% | -7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.64% | 14.86% | -6.22% |
IBGM vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBGM has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBGM vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
IBGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than TLT's 4.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBGM iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.53% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IBGM and TLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IBGM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBGM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 0.80% for IBGM.
IBGM tracks ICE 2056 Maturity US Treasury Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGM and 0.15% for TLT.
Find the right allocation for IBGM and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer