IBGM vs. BUCK
IBGM (iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. IBGM is passively managed, while BUCK is actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBGM charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
IBGM vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBGM
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 7.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBGM vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBGM iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF | -0.16% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGM and BUCK is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGM vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
IBGM
BUCK
IBGM vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF (IBGM) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBGM | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 1.47 | -1.57 |
Drawdowns
IBGM vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGM drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum BUCK drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGM and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGM | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -5.43% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -0.04% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -0.49% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
IBGM vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGM | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.27% | 3.10% | +5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.27% | 3.48% | +4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.27% | 3.48% | +4.79% |
IBGM vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBGM has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBGM vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
IBGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than BUCK's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.41% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
IBGM iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBGM and BUCK have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBGM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBGM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.
BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.82% for IBGM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGM and 0.35% for BUCK.
Find the right allocation for IBGM and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer