PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGL.MI vs. 4GLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGL.MI vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist (IBGL.MI) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGL.MI achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than 4GLD.DE's 2.22% return. Over the past 10 years, IBGL.MI has underperformed 4GLD.DE with an annualized return of -2.10%, while 4GLD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return.


IBGL.MI

1D
-0.95%
1M
1.07%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
-3.37%
3Y*
-0.04%
5Y*
-7.32%
10Y*
-2.10%

4GLD.DE

1D
-1.24%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
2.22%
6M
5.65%
1Y
29.87%
3Y*
27.89%
5Y*
19.72%
10Y*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGL.MI vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBGL.MI
iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist
-0.06%-5.53%-0.17%10.21%-34.75%-7.00%11.97%15.43%3.11%-1.15%
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
2.22%49.32%34.57%9.32%7.12%4.03%13.05%21.25%3.20%-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGL.MI and 4GLD.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2008

0.17

The correlation between IBGL.MI and 4GLD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGL.MI vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGL.MI
IBGL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IBGL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGL.MI vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist (IBGL.MI) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBGL.MI4GLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.25

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

1.80

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

4.61

-5.59

IBGL.MI vs. 4GLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGL.MI Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGL.MI and 4GLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBGL.MI4GLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

1.29

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.54

1.22

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

0.92

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.65

-0.38

Drawdowns

IBGL.MI vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGL.MI drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, which is greater than 4GLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGL.MI and 4GLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGL.MI4GLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.83%

-36.79%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.26%

-16.54%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.10%

-16.54%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.23%

-16.54%

-25.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

-18.23%

-25.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.45%

-15.43%

-22.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.22%

-11.83%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

6.45%

-3.01%

Volatility

IBGL.MI vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist (IBGL.MI) is 3.70%, while Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that IBGL.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGL.MI4GLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

5.54%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.20%

20.12%

-12.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.28%

23.06%

-13.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

16.00%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

14.37%

-2.87%

IBGL.MI vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGL.MI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBGL.MI vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBGL.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, while 4GLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBGL.MI
iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist
3.68%3.53%3.18%2.66%1.32%0.53%0.74%1.27%1.50%1.35%1.48%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBGL.MI and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IBGL.MI.

IBGL.MI is categorized as European Government Bonds, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. IBGL.MI tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 30 Year Term Index, while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IBGL.MI and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGL.MI and 4GLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer