IBGL.MI vs. CSNDX.MI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist (IBGL.MI) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI).

IBGL.MI and CSNDX.MI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBGL.MI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 30 Year Term Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2006. CSNDX.MI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both IBGL.MI and CSNDX.MI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IBGL.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist (IBGL.MI) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IBGL.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBGL.MI iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist	-0.17%	-5.53%	-0.17%	10.21%	-34.75%	-7.00%	11.97%	15.43%	3.11%	-1.15%
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-6.75%	6.74%	35.09%	50.07%	-30.24%	39.83%	35.45%	41.91%	3.62%	16.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGL.MI achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly higher than CSNDX.MI's -6.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IBGL.MI has underperformed CSNDX.MI with an annualized return of -2.07%, while CSNDX.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 18.25% annualized return.

IBGL.MI

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -4.10%
• YTD: -0.17%
• 6M: -0.70%
• 1Y: -0.06%
• 3Y*: -0.32%
• 5Y*: -7.84%
• 10Y*: -2.07%

CSNDX.MI

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -4.05%
• YTD: -6.75%
• 6M: -3.20%
• 1Y: 15.29%
• 3Y*: 19.36%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: 18.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGL.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGL.MI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CSNDX.MI's 0.30% expense ratio.

CSNDX.MI

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

IBGL.MI

iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist

Return for Risk

IBGL.MI vs. CSNDX.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGL.MI

IBGL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 11
IBGL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
IBGL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
IBGL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 10
IBGL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
IBGL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CSNDX.MI

CSNDX.MI Risk / Return Rank: 44
CSNDX.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
CSNDX.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
CSNDX.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CSNDX.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CSNDX.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGL.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist (IBGL.MI) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBGL.MI	CSNDX.MI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	0.75	-0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	1.14	-1.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.16	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	1.13	-1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.02	3.81	-3.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBGL.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGL.MI Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the CSNDX.MI Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGL.MI and CSNDX.MI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBGL.MI	CSNDX.MI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	0.75	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.58	0.64	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.18	0.92	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.98	-0.71

Correlation

The correlation between IBGL.MI and CSNDX.MI is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

IBGL.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Dividend Comparison

IBGL.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, while CSNDX.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBGL.MI iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist	3.53%	3.53%	3.18%	2.66%	1.32%	0.53%	0.74%	1.27%	1.50%	1.35%	1.48%	1.83%
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IBGL.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGL.MI drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, which is greater than CSNDX.MI's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGL.MI and CSNDX.MI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBGL.MI	CSNDX.MI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.83%	-31.19%	-12.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.12%	-13.50%	+7.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.23%	-31.19%	-11.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.83%	-31.19%	-12.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.52%	-9.89%	-27.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.98%	-5.47%	-6.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	4.02%	-1.06%

Volatility

IBGL.MI vs. CSNDX.MI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist (IBGL.MI) is 3.82%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that IBGL.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSNDX.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBGL.MI	CSNDX.MI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	4.11%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.61%	11.61%	-6.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.73%	20.53%	-11.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.40%	19.77%	-6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.42%	19.61%	-8.19%