IBDW vs. BSCR
IBDW (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF) and BSCR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - IBDW tracks the Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index while BSCR tracks the NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBDW returned 0.14%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for BSCR. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
IBDW vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDW achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.57% return.
IBDW
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCR
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
IBDW vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF | -0.19% | 9.07% | 2.96% | 9.40% | -17.13% | 0.36% |
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.57% | 5.77% | 4.52% | 6.41% | -9.56% | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDW and BSCR is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IBDW and BSCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDW vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank
IBDW
BSCR
IBDW vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBDW | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 2.16 | -0.97 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 10.40 | -8.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 45.90 | -41.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBDW vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDW drawdown since its inception was -23.87%, which is greater than BSCR's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDW and BSCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDW | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.87% | -17.26% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.42% | -0.42% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.61% | -2.27% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.87% | -14.87% | -9.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.03% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -3.30% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.09% | +0.69% |
Volatility
IBDW vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.20%. This indicates that IBDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDW | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 0.20% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 0.60% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46% | 1.01% | +2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 4.08% | +3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.20% | 5.32% | +1.88% |
IBDW vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBDW and BSCR have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBDW vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison
IBDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than BSCR's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.28% | 4.26% | 4.27% | 3.74% | 2.65% | 2.12% | 2.46% | 3.11% | 3.35% | 0.78% |
IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF | 4.81% | 4.78% | 5.00% | 4.50% | 3.70% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDW and BSCR have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBDW has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to BSCR (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDW dropped -23.87% vs BSCR's -17.26%.
On 5-year performance, BSCR leads with 1.36% vs 0.14% for IBDW. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSCR has performed better with a 1.36% return vs 0.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDW and BSCR have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
IBDW has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 4.28% for BSCR.
IBDW tracks Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index, while BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDW and BSCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer