PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDR vs. BSCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDR vs. BSCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBDR

1D
0.04%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.69%
6M
1.81%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*

BSCP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDR vs. BSCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBDR
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF
1.69%4.99%4.98%5.96%-8.28%-1.79%8.88%14.81%-2.80%5.96%
BSCP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.19%5.06%5.11%-5.99%-1.37%8.10%12.76%-1.90%5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDR and BSCP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between IBDR and BSCP has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDR vs. BSCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDR
IBDR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
IBDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDR vs. BSCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBDRBSCPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

52.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

181.59

IBDR vs. BSCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBDR vs. BSCP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDRBSCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

Volatility

IBDR vs. BSCP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDRBSCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

IBDR vs. BSCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBDR and BSCP have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDR vs. BSCP - Dividend Comparison

IBDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than BSCP's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
1.92%3.99%3.96%3.39%2.24%1.93%2.42%3.12%3.26%2.93%2.94%0.75%
IBDR
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF
4.12%4.20%4.13%3.41%2.44%2.11%2.61%3.25%3.56%3.22%0.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDR and BSCP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBDR and BSCP have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 1.92% for BSCP.

IBDR tracks Barclays December 2026 Maturity Corporate Index, while BSCP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2025 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDR and BSCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer