IBDQ vs. STIP
IBDQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF) and STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while STIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for STIP.
Performance
IBDQ vs. STIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBDQ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STIP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 3.17%
IBDQ vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 0.00% | 4.13% | 5.12% | 5.23% | -5.91% | -1.49% | 8.27% | 13.59% | -2.39% | 6.28% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.01% | 6.03% | 4.77% | 4.63% | -3.02% | 5.68% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 0.54% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDQ and STIP is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015 | 0.44 |
The correlation between IBDQ and STIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDQ vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank
IBDQ
STIP
IBDQ vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDQ | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.07 | — |
Drawdowns
IBDQ vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDQ | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.06% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.99% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility
IBDQ vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDQ | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.46% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 2.75% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 2.45% | — |
IBDQ vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBDQ vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison
IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than STIP's 4.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 2.08% | 3.77% | 3.81% | 3.27% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 3.21% | 3.52% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.64% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.30% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDQ and STIP have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBDQ.
STIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 2.08% for IBDQ.
IBDQ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while STIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. IBDQ tracks Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while STIP tracks Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDQ and 0.06% for STIP.
Find the right allocation for IBDQ and STIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer