IBCI.L vs. EIMI.L
IBCI.L (iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBCI.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc), while EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBCI.L returned 1.54%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for EIMI.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBCI.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.
Performance
IBCI.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBCI.L is traded in GBP, while EIMI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIMI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCI.L achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 18.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCI.L has underperformed EIMI.L with an annualized return of 1.54%, while EIMI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
IBCI.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- 6M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- 0.53%
- 3Y*
- 1.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
EIMI.L
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- 6M
- 12.65%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 33.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
IBCI.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCI.L iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -0.50% | 6.03% | -4.55% | 3.48% | -4.33% | -0.79% | 8.45% | 1.18% | -1.05% | 5.00% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 18.15% | 22.75% | 9.23% | 5.48% | -10.12% | 0.29% | 15.31% | 11.94% | -9.09% | 25.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCI.L and EIMI.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2014 | 0.12 |
The correlation between IBCI.L and EIMI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (5 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCI.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBCI.L
EIMI.L
IBCI.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBCI.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.31 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 3.12 | -2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.29 | 9.00 | -8.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBCI.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCI.L drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, roughly equal to the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCI.L and EIMI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCI.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.47% | -31.70% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.49% | -10.58% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -15.79% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.28% | -21.19% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.53% | -26.10% | +11.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -9.57% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -8.66% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 3.68% | -2.15% |
Volatility
IBCI.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L) is 1.34%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that IBCI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCI.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 8.66% | -7.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.71% | 18.40% | -14.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.90% | 20.32% | -15.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.49% | 17.17% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 18.54% | -6.78% |
IBCI.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCI.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCI.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCI.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCI.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCI.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCI.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.
IBCI.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IBCI.L tracks iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc), while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IBCI.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.
Find the right allocation for IBCI.L and EIMI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer