PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCI.DE vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCI.DE vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBCI.DE is traded in EUR, while QQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCI.DE achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 22.09% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCI.DE has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 1.55%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.60% annualized return.


IBCI.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.19%
YTD
3.15%
6M
2.77%
1Y
3.37%
3Y*
1.96%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
1.55%

QQQ

1D
0.00%
1M
7.67%
YTD
22.09%
6M
18.99%
1Y
39.73%
3Y*
25.06%
5Y*
18.95%
10Y*
21.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCI.DE vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBCI.DE
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF
3.15%0.81%-0.17%5.41%-9.30%6.19%2.83%6.31%-1.54%1.05%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
17.17%6.44%33.87%50.21%-28.40%36.95%36.37%42.10%4.56%16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCI.DE and QQQ is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCI.DE vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCI.DE
IBCI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IBCI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCI.DE vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCI.DEQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

3.62

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.25

11.36

-7.11

IBCI.DE vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCI.DE and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCI.DEQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.48

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.86

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.96

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.79

-0.53

Drawdowns

IBCI.DE vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCI.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCI.DE and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCI.DEQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-46.01%

+29.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.87%

-11.01%

+9.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.59%

-27.21%

+21.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.37%

-30.99%

+14.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.37%

-30.99%

+14.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-0.62%

-4.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-7.79%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

3.51%

-2.73%

Volatility

IBCI.DE vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) is 1.58%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that IBCI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCI.DEQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

3.58%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

11.51%

-8.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

16.16%

-12.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.86%

22.02%

-15.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.16%

22.60%

-16.44%

IBCI.DE vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCI.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCI.DE vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

IBCI.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCI.DE
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.40%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCI.DE and QQQ have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCI.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCI.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

IBCI.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. IBCI.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IBCI.DE and 0.18% for QQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCI.DE and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer