PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCA vs. SDCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCA vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCA achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than SDCI's 24.19% return.


IBCA

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.49%
6M
-0.24%
YTD
-0.06%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SDCI

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.77%
6M
22.42%
YTD
24.19%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
20.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCA vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBCA and SDCI is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCA vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCA
IBCA Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IBCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCA Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCA Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCA vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCASDCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.30

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.74

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

8.61

-4.52

IBCA vs. SDCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCA Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the SDCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCA and SDCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCA vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum SDCI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCA and SDCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCASDCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-45.79%

+42.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-11.03%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-6.59%

+4.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-11.53%

+10.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

3.50%

-2.44%

Volatility

IBCA vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) is 1.41%, while USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that IBCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCASDCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

4.84%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.80%

14.60%

-10.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.88%

17.04%

-12.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

18.39%

-12.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.69%

17.07%

-11.38%

IBCA vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SDCI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBCA vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison

IBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than SDCI's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBCA
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF
4.72%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
2.96%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCA and SDCI have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDCI has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to IBCA (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBCA dropped -3.48% vs SDCI's -45.79%.

On 1-year performance, SDCI leads with 28.33% vs 4.78% for IBCA. On fees, IBCA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBCA has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 4.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBCA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDCI.

IBCA has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 2.96% for SDCI.

IBCA is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while SDCI is Commodities. IBCA tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Corporate Index, while SDCI tracks SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBCA and 0.60% for SDCI.

SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCA and SDCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer