PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCA vs. BBAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBCA vs. BBAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBCA vs. BBAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCA achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than BBAG's 0.11% return.


IBCA

1D
0.67%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
0.76%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBAG

1D
0.30%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
0.11%
6M
1.03%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
0.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBCA vs. BBAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IBCA vs. BBAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCA
IBCA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IBCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCA Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BBAG
BBAG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCA vs. BBAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCABBAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

1.01

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

1.43

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.81

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.77

4.90

+0.87

IBCA vs. BBAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the BBAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCA and BBAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCABBAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.01

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.33

+0.81

Correlation

The correlation between IBCA and BBAG is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IBCA vs. BBAG - Dividend Comparison

IBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than BBAG's 4.32% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBCA
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF
4.01%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BBAG
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.32%4.29%4.25%3.60%2.23%1.44%2.26%2.92%0.16%

Drawdowns

IBCA vs. BBAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum BBAG drawdown of -18.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCA and BBAG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCABBAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-18.73%

+15.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.48%

-2.61%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-2.90%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-6.31%

+5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.96%

+0.07%

Volatility

IBCA vs. BBAG - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) at 1.83%. This indicates that IBCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBCABBAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

1.83%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.47%

2.71%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.88%

4.47%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.91%

5.91%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.91%

5.84%

+0.07%